How to Measure Safety Performance?

Introduction

In today’s ever-evolving workplace, prioritizing safety has become more critical. As organizations strive to create a safe and healthy environment for their employees, measuring workplace health and safety performance is key to achieving optimal results. But how exactly can you measure health and safety performance effectively?

This guide explores various methods, metrics, formulas, and calculations, with sample data, to evaluate Workplace Health and Safety performance. It covers leading and lagging indicators, incident rates, and employee surveys, providing tools and techniques to assess the success of your safety program.

We will provide you with a comprehensive understanding of the different measurement methods and guide you on interpreting and utilising the data to drive continuous improvement. Through this knowledge, you will be able to identify areas of improvement, implement corrective actions, and ultimately create a safer and more productive work environment.

Join us as we demystify the process of measuring Workplace Health and Safety performance, empowering you to take the necessary steps towards achieving optimal safety outcomes.

Importance of Measuring Workplace Health and Safety Performance

Measuring Workplace Health and Safety performance is essential for any organization that values the well-being of its employees and aims to enable a healthy work environment. By accurately assessing safety metrics, organizations can identify potential hazards, evaluate the effectiveness of safety protocols, and implement necessary changes to enhance workplace safety. This proactive approach minimizes the risk of accidents and injuries and contributes to overall employee morale and productivity. When employees feel safe, they are more likely to be engaged and motivated, leading to improved performance and lower turnover rates.

Furthermore, measuring safety performance helps organizations comply with legal and regulatory requirements. Strict safety standards govern many industries, and failure to adhere to these regulations can result in severe penalties, including fines and business shutdowns. By consistently monitoring safety performance, organizations can ensure they meet or exceed these standards, avoiding potential legal issues and enhancing their reputation within the industry. A solid safety record can also be a significant competitive advantage, attracting clients and customers who prioritize safety in their business dealings.

Lastly, the insights gained from measuring safety performance can lead to a culture of continuous improvement. Organizations that regularly evaluate their safety metrics can identify trends and patterns, allowing them to address underlying issues before they escalate into more significant problems. This culture promotes accountability and encourages employees to participate actively in safety initiatives. Organizations can drive long-term success and sustainability in their safety programs by cultivating an environment where safety is a shared responsibility.

Why is it Necessary to Measure Safety Performance?

Measuring safety performance is a critical component of effective workplace management. It not only helps prevent accidents and injuries but also cultivates a culture of safety that benefits both employees and the organization. Here are 10 compelling reasons why measuring safety performance is essential:

1. Identifies Risks, Explore Trends and Identifies Areas for Improvement

Regularly assessing safety performance enables organizations to identify potential risks and track trends in their current safety programs and protocols. Management can proactively address deficiencies by understanding where deficiencies lie, ultimately creating a safer work environment.

Organizations can pinpoint areas of concern by analyzing data related to incidents, near misses, and safety audits. This foresight can prevent accidents, safeguard employees and reduce potential liabilities.

2. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Safety Initiatives

Organizations implement various safety programs and initiatives to mitigate risks. By measuring safety performance, businesses can assess the effectiveness of these efforts. Key performance indicators (KPIs) can reveal whether training programs are successful if safety protocols are followed well and if additional resources are needed to improve safety outcomes.

3. Enhances Compliance with Regulations

Workplaces are subject to numerous local, state, and federal safety regulations. Organizations can remain compliant with these regulations by measuring safety performance and avoiding potential fines and legal complications. Tracking performance helps to ensure that safety practices are not only implemented but also practical.

4. Benchmarking and Industry Analysis

Benchmarking safety performance against industry standards and best practices is crucial for organizations looking to enhance their safety protocols. It is essential not only for compliance but also for positioning the organization as a leader in safety. Here are several benefits of utilizing benchmarking and engaging in industry analysis:

4.1. Identify Gaps in Safety Performance

Benchmarking allows companies to compare their safety metrics with those of industry leaders. Organizations can identify gaps in their safety performance by understanding where they stand relative to peers. This analysis reveals specific areas for improvement, such as reducing incident rates, enhancing training programs, or addressing equipment inadequacies. Identifying these gaps is the first step toward implementing effective solutions.

4.2. Set Realistic Safety Goals

Through benchmarking, organizations can establish realistic and attainable safety goals. Companies can set meaningful targets that align with the sector’s best practices by analysing industry averages and trends. Focusing on achievable goals motivates employees and promotes a culture of success as they strive to meet or exceed these benchmarks.

5. Learn from Industry Leaders

Analyzing best practices from organizations recognized for their safety performance can provide valuable insights. By studying successful strategies and techniques, organizations can adopt effective measures proven to work in similar environments. Whether it’s investing in advanced safety technologies or adopting employee involvement programs, learning from industry professionals.

6. Promotes Employee Engagement and Accountability

When safety performance is measured and communicated, employees become more aware of their responsibilities in maintaining a safe work environment. Involving individuals in safety-related metrics encourages them to take ownership and promotes a culture of accountability. Employees will likely engage more actively in safety training and initiatives when they see tangible results.

7. Informs Decision-Making

Quantifiable safety data empowers management to make informed safety strategies and investment decisions. By using historical data and trends, organizations can:

• Allocate resources effectively.
• Promptly respond to emerging safety issues.
• Anticipate and mitigate potential hazards.

8. Reduces Costs Related to Incidents

Workplace injuries can lead to significant financial burdens, including medical expenses, lost productivity, and legal fees. By proactively measuring and improving safety performance, organizations can reduce these costs and prevent incidents before they occur. This contributes to a healthier bottom line and a more sustainable business overall.

9. Supports Continuous Improvement

Safety is not a one-time effort but an ongoing process. By regularly tracking key safety metrics, organizations can identify areas for improvement and implement innovative solutions. This proactive approach allows for ongoing adjustments and enhancements to safety programs, ensuring they evolve with the changing nature of the workplace and industry.

10. Builds a Positive Reputation

A strong commitment to safety and demonstrated performance outcomes can enhance an organization’s internal and external reputation. Companies prioritizing workplace safety often attract better talent, gain employee loyalty, and position themselves favourably against competitors.

How do we measure safety performance?

Measuring safety performance involves using various indicators and methodologies that provide insight into the effectiveness of safety protocols and the overall safety culture within an organization—without relying solely on direct incident data.

Measuring safety performance is crucial to understanding how well your organization is doing in preventing accidents, injuries, and illnesses. An effective measurement strategy offers insight into the current safety status and guides continuous improvement efforts. It helps identify areas for improvement, track progress, and cultivate a strong safety culture. Here’s a comprehensive list of metrics to measure safety performance:

1. Establish Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):

Establishing Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) is fundamental in measuring organizational safety performance. KPIs provide quantifiable metrics that help assess the effectiveness of safety protocols and initiatives.

Common KPIs include incident rates, which track the number of workplace accidents over a specific period, and near-miss reports, which highlight potentially hazardous situations that did not result in injury but could have. Employee participation in safety programs is another critical KPI, as it indicates employee engagement and commitment to safety within the workforce.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are essential metrics that help organizations evaluate their safety performance and provide a clear picture of their progress. Common safety KPIs include:

1️⃣ How to Calculate Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR)

The Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is a key safety metric used to measure workplace safety performance. It calculates the number of OSHA-recordable incidents per 200,000 work hours, allowing for standardized industry comparisons.

TRIR Formula:

\( TRIR = \left( \frac{\text{Total OSHA Recordable Cases} \times 200,000}{\text{Total Hours Worked}} \right) \)

Example Calculation:

Assume the following workplace data:

• 5 OSHA-recordable cases in a year
• 500,000 total hours worked

TRIR Calculation:

\[
TRIR = \frac{5 \times 200,000}{500,000}
\]

\[
TRIR = \frac{1,000,000}{500,000}
\]

\[
TRIR = 2.0
\]

This means the company has a TRIR of 2.0, indicating two recordable incidents per 100 full-time employees working a year.

Why TRIR Matters:

✅ It helps organizations track safety performance.

✅ Allows comparison with industry benchmarks.

✅ Identifies trends and areas for improvement in workplace safety.

2️⃣ How to Calculate Lost Time Incident Rate (LTIR)

The Lost Time Incident Rate (LTIR) measures workplace injuries severe enough to cause an employee to miss work. It helps organizations track serious injuries over time and compare them with industry standards.

LTIR Formula:

\( LTIR = \left(\frac{\text{Number of Lost Time Incidents} \times 200,000}{\text{Total Hours Worked}}\right) \)

Where:

• Number of Lost Time Incidents → The number of work-related incidents resulting in time off.
• 200,000 → Standardized figure (100 full-time workers × 40 hours/week × 50 weeks).
• Total Hours Worked → The total number of hours worked by all employees during the reporting period.

LTIR Example of Construction Site 🏗️ vs. Office Environment 🏢

🏗️ Construction Company (High-Risk Industry)

Let’s assume:

• Lost Time Incidents: 4
• Total Hours Worked: 500,000

LTIR Calculations:

\[
LTIR = \frac{4 \times 200,000}{500,000} = 1.6
\]

LTIR = 1.6 → Moderate safety concerns.

🏢 Corporate Office (Low-Risk Industry)

Let’s assume:

• Lost Time Incidents: 1
• Total Hours Worked: 1,00,000

\[
LTIR = \frac{1 \times 200,000}{1,000,000} = 0.2
\]

LTIR = 0.2 → Excellent safety performance.

Are These Insights Enough to Decide?

While LTIR provides valuable data on workplace safety, it shouldn’t be the sole factor in decision-making. A comprehensive safety assessment should also consider factors such as:

• Severity of injuries – A low LTIR might still include serious injuries.
• Near-miss incidents – Identifying hazards before they result in injuries.
• Safety culture – Training, compliance, and proactive measures in place.
• Industry benchmarks – Comparing LTIR to industry standards for a full picture.

Comparison Insight:

• The construction site has a higher LTIR due to the physically demanding work.
• The office environment has a much lower LTIR, showing a safer workplace.

📢 Key Takeaway: The same LTIR doesn’t mean the same level of danger across industries.

Why does LTIR matter?

✅ Safety Benchmarking – Helps compare safety performance with industry standards.
✅ Regulatory Compliance – Many industries are required to report LTIR to authorities (e.g., OSHA).
✅ Risk Management – Identifies trends and helps prevent future injuries.
✅ Financial Impact – Reduces compensation claims and downtime costs.
✅ Reputation & Employee Morale – A safer workplace attracts talent and builds trust.

3️⃣ How to Calculate Days Away From Work (DAFW)

Days Away From Work (DAFW) is a key safety metric that tracks the number of workdays employees miss due to occupational injuries or illnesses. It provides insight into the severity of workplace incidents and helps organizations measure their safety performance over time.

DAFW Formula:

\[
DAFW = \frac{\text{Total DAFW Cases} \times 200,000}{\text{Total Hours Worked}}
\]

Where:

• Total DAFW Cases → Number of cases where an employee missed at least one full workday due to injury or illness
• 200,000 → Standardized benchmark (100 full-time employees × 40 hours/week × 50 weeks)
• Total Hours Worked → Total hours worked by all employees in a given period

Example: Factory 🏭 vs. Office Environment 🏢
Let’s compare two workplaces: a manufacturing plant and a corporate office.

🏭 Manufacturing Plant (High-Risk Industry)

• DAFW Cases: 6
• Total Hours Worked: 600,000

DAFW Calculation:

\[
DAFW = \frac{6 \times 200,000}{600,000} = 2.0
\]

DAFW Rate = 2.0 → Moderate risk

Corporate Office (Low-Risk Industry)

• DAFW Cases: 1
• Total Hours Worked: 1,000,000

DAFW Calculation:

\[
DAFW = \frac{1 \times 200,000}{1,000,000} = 0.2
\]

DAFW Rate = 0.2 → Very low risk

📢 Key Takeaway: The same DAFW doesn’t mean the same level of danger across industries.

By regularly monitoring these KPIs, organizations can identify trends, uncover areas needing improvement, and evaluate the overall impact of their safety initiatives. This data-driven approach allows management to make informed decisions and prioritize resources effectively, encouraging a proactive safety culture emphasizing prevention over reaction.

4️⃣ How to Calculate Safe Man-Hours?

Safe Man-Hours refers to the total number of hours worked without a lost-time injury. It helps organizations track safety performance and highlight periods of accident-free work.

Without Sub-Contractors

Formula for Safe Man-Hours

\[
\text{Safe Man-Hours} = \text{Total Hours Worked} – \text{Hours Lost Due to Incidents}
\]

If we want to measure continuous safe working hours since the last Lost Time Injury (LTI), the formula becomes:

\[
\text{Safe Man-Hours} = \sum (\text{Total Hours Worked per Employee}) \text{ since last LTI}
\]

Example Calculations:

A construction company has 200 workers, each working 8 hours daily for 25 days per month. The company has been accident-free for 6 months.

\[
\begin{aligned}
\text{Total Hours Worked} &= \text{Number of Employees} \times \text{Hours Worked per Day} \\
&\quad \times \text{Days Worked per Month} \times \text{Months Since Last LTI}
\end{aligned}
\]

\[
= 200 \times 8 \times 25 \times 6
\]

\[
= 240,000 \text{ Safe Man-Hours}
\]

Since there have been no lost-time injuries, the total hours remain accident-free.

With Sub-Contractors

Safe man-hours is a critical safety metric that tracks the total hours worked without a Lost Time Injury (LTI). When subcontractors are involved, their hours must be included to ensure an accurate measure of workplace safety performance.

To calculate total safe man-hours, sum the hours worked by direct employees and subcontractors:

\[
\begin{aligned}
\text{Safe Man-Hours} &= (\text{Employees} + \text{Subcontractors}) \times \text{Hours per Day} \\
&\quad \times \text{Days per Month} \times \text{Months Since Last LTI}
\end{aligned}
\]

or, breaking it into separate components:

\[
\text{Safe Man-Hours} = \left( \text{Total Hours (Employees)} + \text{Total Hours (Subcontractors)} \right)
\]

Where:

• Employees = Total number of company employees.
• Subcontractors = Total number of subcontractors working on the project.
• Hours per Day = Average daily working hours per worker.
• Days per Month = Average number of working days in a month.
• Months Since Last LTI = The number of months since the last lost time incident.
• Total Hours (Employees) = Employees × Hours per Day × Days per Month × Months Since Last LTI
• Total Hours (Subcontractors) = Subcontractor Employees × Hours per Day × Days per Month × Months Since Last LTI

Example Calculations (Construction Site):

Let’s assume the following scenario for a construction company:

• Company Employees: 100
• Subcontractors: 50
• Hours Worked per Day: 8
• Days Worked per Month: 22
• Months Since Last LTI: 12

\[
\text{Total Hours (Employees)} = 100 \times 8 \times 22 \times 12 = 211,200
\]

\[
\text{Total Hours (Subcontractors)} = 50 \times 8 \times 22 \times 12 = 105,600
\]

\[
\text{Safe Man-Hours} = 211,200 + 105,600 = 316,800
\]

✅ Result: The company has achieved 316,800 Safe Man-Hours without an LTI.

Why Safe Man-Hours Matter?

✅ Indicates how long a company has operated without serious accidents.
✅ Identifies patterns to improve safety practices.
✅ Demonstrates a commitment and establishes trust between Client & Contractor to a safe working environment.
✅ Employees become more safety-conscious when they see long accident-free records.
✅ Companies with high Safe Man-Hours often receive industry safety awards.
✅ If Safe Man-Hours decreases, safety measures might need improvement.

3. Safety Audits and Inspections:

Safety audits and inspections are essential tools for evaluating workplace safety performance. They help organizations identify hazards, ensure compliance with regulations, and improve safety programs. Measuring the effectiveness of these audits and inspections involves both quantitative and qualitative methods.

Therefore, detailed records of audit and inspection findings must be maintained. Critically track the implementation and effectiveness of corrective actions to address identified issues, including any citations or violations received and the steps taken to resolve them.

Key Metrics for Measuring Safety Audits and Inspections

To assess the impact of safety audits and inspections, organizations can track:

• Number of Inspections Conducted – The total count of safety inspections performed within a given period.
• Number of Audit Findings – The number of safety violations, hazards, or non-compliance issues identified.
• Percentage of Issues Resolved – The proportion of identified issues corrected within a specified time.
• Time to Corrective Action – The average time to address identified safety concerns.
• Repeat Violations – The recurrence of previously identified issues, indicating ineffective corrective actions.
• Audit Score or Compliance Rating – A numerical rating that reflects the overall compliance level based on an audit checklist.

Example Calculation for Audit Effectiveness

If a company plans 71 safety audits/inspections in a year and successfully conducts 66, where 5 audits/inspections are missed, the audit / inspection completion rate can be calculated as follow:

Formula:

\[
\small
\text{Audit & Inspection Completion Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Actual Audit & Inspection Conducted}}{\text{Audit & Inspection Planned in the Year}} \right) \times 100
\]

\[
\small
\text{Audit & Inspection Completion Rate} = \left( \frac{66}{71} \right) \times 100 = 93\%
\]

This ✅ 93% completion rate indicates strong adherence to the planned audit schedule, though a ⚠️ 7% gap remains to be addressed.

Sample Table of Tracking Safety Audits / Inspection

Sr #	Audit / Inspection	Frequency	Target	Actual	Gap
1	Workplace Safety Audit	Monthly	12	10	2
2	Fire Safety Inspection	Quarterly	4	3	1
3	PPE Compliance Check	Weekly	52	50	2
4	Equipment Maintenance Audit	Bi-Annual	2	2	0
5	Hazardous Substance Storage Inspection	Annual	1	1	0
	Total		71	66	5

This table helps track the effectiveness of audits and inspections by identifying gaps between the targeted and actual audits conducted. A gap indicates missed audits or inspections, which may impact workplace safety.

Why Measuring Safety Audits and Inspections Matters?

✅ Regular inspections help proactively identify and mitigate hazards.
✅ Tracking audit performance helps organizations meet safety laws and standards.
✅ Clear metrics encourage employees and management to take responsibility for safety improvements.
✅ A high percentage of resolved audit findings correlates with fewer accidents and injuries.

4. Corrective Action Monitoring:

Corrective Action Compliance is a critical metric in measuring safety performance, ensuring that identified hazards and non-conformances are addressed within the required timeframe. It reflects an organization’s commitment to continuous improvement and regulatory adherence.

Formula for Corrective Action Compliance Rate

\[ \text{Corrective Action Compliance Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Corrective Actions Closed on Time}}{\text{Total Corrective Actions Identified}} \right) \times 100\]

Sample Table of Corrective Actions

Sr #	Corrective Actions	Total	Open	Close	Gap
1	Machine Guarding Issue	10	2	8	2
2	Electrical Safety Hazards	7	1	6	1
3	PPE Non-Compliance	5	0	5	0
4	Fire Safety Violations	8	3	5	3
5	Unsafe Work Practices	12	4	8	4
6	Housekeeping Issues	6	1	5	1
Total		48	11	37	11

Example Calculation

Suppose a company identifies 48 corrective actions during safety audits in a year. Out of these, 37 were addressed within the specified timeframe.

\[ \text{Corrective Action Compliance Rate} = \left( \frac{37}{48} \right) \times 100 = 77\% \]

Key Takeaways:

• The company should reduce the 23% gap by implementing all corrective actions within deadlines.
• Regular follow-ups and assigning accountability can improve compliance.
• Benchmarking against industry standards helps in evaluating safety performance effectively.

✅ A higher compliance rate (close to 100%) suggests a proactive safety culture, where corrective actions are implemented effectively.
⚠️ A lower compliance rate (below 80%) may indicate delays in addressing hazards, potentially increasing workplace risks.

Why Corrective Action Compliance Matters?

✅ Ensures regulatory compliance by addressing safety issues proactively.
✅ Reduces workplace risks, preventing recurring hazards.
✅ Improves safety culture, reinforcing accountability.
✅ Enhances audit performance, demonstrating a structured approach to safety management.

5. Behavioral Observation:

Behavioral observation is a key safety performance metric that evaluates employee actions, compliance with safety protocols, and adherence to best practices in the workplace. This proactive approach helps identify at-risk behaviors and reinforce positive safety habits before incidents occur.

Key Metrics for Behavioral Observation

To measure behavioral observation effectively, organizations typically track:

• Total Observations Conducted – The number of behavioral safety observations performed.
• Safe vs. At-Risk Behaviors – The percentage of observed behaviors that align with safety standards versus those that pose risks.
• Positive Reinforcement Rate – The number of times safe behaviors are recognized and reinforced.
• Corrective Actions Taken – The number of interventions made to correct unsafe behaviors.

Behavioral Compliance Rate (BCR) Formula

\[ \text{Behavioral Compliance Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Safe Behaviors Observed}}{\text{Total Behaviors Observed}} \right) \times 100\]

Sample Table of Behavioral Observations

Sr #	Month	Total Behavioral Observations	Safe Behaviors Observed	Unsafe Behaviors Observed	Gap
1	January	100	90	10	10
2	February	120	108	12	12
3	March	80	72	8	8
4	April	150	135	15	15
5	May	200	180	20	20
6	June	130	120	10	10
7	July	140	130	10	10
8	August	110	100	10	10
9	September	160	145	15	15
10	October	170	160	10	10
11	November	180	165	15	15
12	December	190	175	15	15
Total		1,850	1,650	200	200

Example Calculations:

For example, if 1,850 total behaviors were observed and 1,650 were safe, the compliance rate would be:

\[ \text{Behavioral Compliance Rate} = \left( \frac{1,650}{1,850} \right) \times 100 = 89\%\]

• An 89% compliance rate indicates that most observed behaviours were safe.
• However, the remaining 11% (200 unsafe behaviours) highlights areas for improvement.
• A compliance rate below 90% may suggest additional training, reinforcement of safety policies, or increased focus on specific at-risk behaviors.

Why Behavioral Observation Matters

✅ Proactive Safety Approach – Helps prevent accidents by identifying unsafe behaviors before they lead to incidents.

✅ Improves Safety Culture – Encourages employee engagement and accountability in workplace safety.

✅ Enhances Training Programs – Provides insights into areas where additional safety training may be needed.

6. Training & Drills Effectiveness:

Training and drills are essential to workplace safety programs, ensuring employees are well-prepared for emergencies and daily operational hazards. The effectiveness of these initiatives can be measured using key performance indicators (KPIs) that assess knowledge retention, skill application, and response times.

Key Metrics for Measuring Training & Drills Effectiveness

1️⃣ Training Completion Rate (TCR)

• Measures the percentage of employees who completed mandatory safety training.
• A high completion rate indicates strong participation and compliance with training requirements.

Formula

\( \text{Training Completion Rate (TCR)} = \left( \dfrac{\text{Employees Who Completed Training}}{\text{Total Employees Required to Train}} \right) \times 100 \)

Sample Date of Trainings

Sr #	Training Program	Total Employees Required	Employees Completed	Completion Rate (%)
1	Fire Safety Training	200	180	90%
2	First Aid Certification	150	140	93%
3	Hazard Communication	175	160	91%
Total		525	480	91%

Example Calculations:

\[ \text{TCR} = \left( \frac{\text{480}}{\text{525}} \right) \times 100=91\% \]

The overall training completion rate is 91%, indicating good compliance.

2️⃣ Knowledge Retention Rate Sample Data

Knowledge retention rate measures the percentage of information a learner remembers over time. It’s a critical metric in education and training, as it indicates the effectiveness of learning strategies and the long-term impact of instruction.

A high retention rate suggests that the learning material and delivery methods are conducive to long-term memory, while a low rate may signal a need for improvement in instructional design or reinforcement techniques.

Factors like the learner’s motivation, the complexity of the subject matter, the learning environment, and the time elapsed since learning all influence knowledge retention. Improving knowledge retention often involves techniques like spaced repetition, active recall, and connecting new information to existing knowledge.

• Assesses how much information employees retain from safety training.
• Measured through quizzes, practical assessments, or on-the-job evaluations before and after training.

The formula to calculate the knowledge retention rate is:

\[ \text{Knowledge Retention Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Post-Test Score-Pre-Test Score}}{\text{Pre-Test Score}} \right) \times 100 \]

Where

• Pre-Test Score = Employee’s knowledge level before training.
• Post-Test Score = Employee’s knowledge level after training.
• The formula calculates the percentage improvement in knowledge retention after training.

Sample Data To Calculate The Knowledge Retention Rate

Sr #	Training Program	Pre-Test Score (%)	Post-Test Score (%)	Retention Rate (%)
1	Fire Safety Training	65%	85%	30.8%
2	First Aid Certification	70%	88%	25.7%
3	Chemical Safety Training	60%	82%	36.7%
Average		65%	85%	31%

Calculations:

\[ \text{Knowledge Retention Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{85-65}}{\text{65}} \right) \times 100 \]

• Fire Safety Training shows a 30.8% improvement, indicating employees significantly enhanced their fire safety knowledge.
• First Aid Certification has a 25.7% improvement, meaning employees have retained most first aid procedures.
• Chemical Safety Training shows the highest retention rate at 36.7%, suggesting strong absorption of chemical hazard information.
• The average knowledge retention rate across all programs is 31%, demonstrating the overall effectiveness of training sessions.
• A retention rate above 30% is generally considered excellent, showing that employees have effectively learned and retained safety-critical knowledge.

3️⃣ Drill Performance Score

• Evaluate how well employees respond to emergency drills (e.g., fire evacuation, chemical spill response).
• Factors include reaction time, adherence to procedures, and teamwork.
• The score is calculated based on predefined performance criteria.

Formula to Calculate Drill Performance Score

\[ \text{Drill Performance Score} = \left( \dfrac{\text{Successful Execution}}{\text{Total Employees}} \right) \times 100 \]

Sample Date of Drill Performance

Sr #	Drill Type	Total Employees	Successful Execution	Performance Score (%)
1	Fire Evacuation	200	180	90%
2	Chemical Spill	100	85	85%
3	First Aid Response	150	140	93%
Average		450	405	90%

Calculations

\[ \text{Drill Performance Score} = \left( \dfrac{\text{405}}{\text{450}} \right) \times 100 \]

Drill performance scores are 90%, showing employees are well-trained in responding to emergencies.

4️⃣ Post-Training Incident Rate

• Compares the number of safety incidents before and after training to determine its effectiveness.
• A decrease in incidents suggests that training improved workplace safety awareness.

Formula:

\( \text{Reduction in Incidents} = \left( \frac{\text{Incidents Before Training} – \text{Incidents After Training}}{\text{Incidents Before Training}} \right) \times 100 \)

Sample Data on Post-Training Incident Rate

Sr #	Training Program	Incidents Before Training	Incidents After Training	Reduction (%)
1	Fire Safety Training	10	5	50%
2	First Aid Certification	8	4	50%
3	Hazard Communication	12	6	50%
Total Reduction		30	15	50%

Calculations

\( \text{Reduction in Incidents} = \left( \frac{\text{30} – \text{15}}{\text{30}} \right) \times 100 = 50\%\)

Incident reduction rate of 50% confirms training effectiveness in preventing accidents.

5️⃣ Drill Participation Rate

• Measures how many employees actively participate in safety drills.
• Low participation may indicate a lack of engagement or inadequate scheduling.

Formula

\[ \text{Participation Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Employees Participated in Drill}}{\text{Total Employees}} \right) \times 100 \]

Sample Data for Drill Participation

Sr #	Drill Type	Total Employees	Participated	Participation Rate (%)
1	Fire Evacuation	200	180	90%
2	Chemical Spill	100	85	85%
3	First Aid Response	150	140	93%
Total		450	405	90%

Calculations

\[ \text{Participation Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{405}}{\text{450}} \right) \times 100 \]

Participation in drills stands at 90%, suggesting strong engagement.

Why It Matters

• Ensures employees retain critical safety knowledge and can act in emergencies.
• Helps organizations identify gaps in training programs and improve safety protocols.
• Reduces workplace incidents, enhances compliance, and fosters a stronger safety culture.

7. Employee Surveys and Feedback:

• Surveys can measure employees’ confidence in applying learned safety procedures.
• A high confidence level indicates that training is practical and well-received.

Formula:

\[ \text{Drill Performance Score} = \left( \dfrac{\text{Successful Execution}}{\text{Total Employees}} \right) \times 100 \]

Sample date of Employee Confidence Levels

Sr #	Training Program	Employees Surveyed	Confidence Level (%)
1	Fire Safety Training	50	85%
2	First Aid Certification	40	90%
3	Hazard Communication	45	80%
Average		135	85%

Calculations

\[ \text{Average Confidence Level} = \left( \dfrac{\text{Total Number of Confident Responses}}{\text{Total Number of Employees Surveyed}} \right) \times 100 \]

Confidence levels among employees are 85%, indicating they feel well-prepared.

8. Benchmarking Against Industry Standards:

Benchmarking is a crucial tool for assessing a company’s safety performance by comparing key safety metrics against industry standards and best practices. This process helps organizations identify gaps, set realistic safety goals, and improve workplace safety culture.

Steps to Benchmark Against Industry Standards

• Collect Safety Data: Track incident rates, training effectiveness, and audit results.
• Compare with Industry Averages: Use OSHA reports, industry associations, or safety benchmarking databases to find standard values.
• Identify Performance Gaps: Determine where the company exceeds or lags behind the industry.
• Set Improvement Targets: If TRIR is higher than the industry average, introduce safety training or hazard reduction strategies.
• Monitor Progress: Regularly update benchmarks and adjust safety programs accordingly.

Why Benchmarking Matters?
✅ Helps identify weaknesses in safety performance.
✅ Encourages continuous improvement in workplace safety.
✅ Aligns with regulatory requirements and industry best practices.
✅ Enhances reputation and stakeholder confidence in safety culture.
By consistently benchmarking against industry standards, organizations can proactively enhance safety measures, reduce incidents, and create a safer work environment.

9. Workplace Safety Culture Assessments:

Assessing workplace safety culture is essential for understanding employees’ attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors toward safety. A strong safety culture leads to proactive hazard identification, reduced incidents, and greater compliance with safety protocols.

Why Workplace Safety Culture Assessments Matter?
✅ Identifies strengths and weaknesses in safety practices.
✅ Encourages open communication and hazard reporting.
✅ Helps prevent incidents before they occur.
✅ Improves compliance with safety regulations.

By regularly measuring workplace safety culture, organizations can develop targeted strategies to foster a safer, more engaged workforce.

10. Incident Investigation Analysis:

Incident investigation analysis is a critical component of measuring safety performance, as it helps organizations identify root causes, implement corrective actions, and prevent future occurrences. A structured approach ensures continuous improvement in workplace safety.

Incident Investigation Analysis – Sample Data & Calculations

Month	Total Incidents	Investigations Completed on Time	Root Cause Identified	Corrective Actions Recommended	Corrective Actions Implemented	Repeated Incidents	Days Taken to Close Investigations
Jan	5	4	4	6	5	1	25
Feb	6	5	5	7	6	1	28
Mar	4	4	4	5	4	0	22
Apr	7	6	6	8	7	1	30
May	5	4	5	6	6	0	26
Jun	8	7	7	9	8	2	35
Jul	6	5	6	7	6	1	29
Aug	5	4	4	6	5	0	24
Sep	6	6	5	7	7	1	27
Oct	4	3	3	5	4	0	20
Nov	7	6	6	8	7	1	31
Dec	5	5	5	6	6	0	23
Total	68	59	60	80	71	7	320

1️⃣ Investigation Completion Rate

It measures how efficiently incidents are investigated within a given timeframe.

Formula

\[ \text{Investigation Completion Rate} = \left( \dfrac{\text{Investigations Completed on Time}}{\text{Total Incidents Requiring Investigation}} \right) \times 100 \]

Calculations

\[ \text{Investigation Completion Rate} = \left( \frac{59}{68} \right) \times 100 = 86.8\%\]

2️⃣ Root Cause Identification Rate

It evaluates the effectiveness of investigations in determining the fundamental reasons behind an incident.

Formula

\[ \text{Root Cause Identification Rate} = \left( \dfrac{Incidents with Identified Root Causes
}{Total Incidents Investigated} \right) \times 100\]

Calculations

\[\text{Root Cause Identification Rate} = \left( \dfrac{60}{68} \right) \times 100 = 88.2\% \]

3️⃣ Corrective Action Implementation Rate

It measures how well corrective measures are applied after an investigation.

Formula

\(
\text{Corrective Action Implementation Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Corrective Actions Implemented}}{\text{Total Recommended Corrective Actions}} \right) \times 100
\)

Calculations

\[ \text{Corrective Action Implementation Rate} = \left( \frac{71}{80} \right) \times 100 = 88.75\% \]

4️⃣ Incident Recurrence Rate

It helps to assess whether corrective actions effectively prevent repeated incidents.

Formula

\[ \text{Incident Recurrence Rate} = \left( \dfrac{Repeated Incidents}{Total Incidents} \right) \times 100]\]

Calculations

\[ \text{Incident Recurrence Rate} = \left( \dfrac{7}{68} \right) \times 100 = 10.3\% \]

Average Investigation Closure Time

It tracks the average time required to investigate and close incidents.

Formula

\[ \text{Average Investigation Closure Time} = \frac{\text{Total Days Taken to Close Investigations}}{\text{Number of Investigations Conducted}} \]

Calculations

\[ \text{Average Investigation Closure Time} = \frac{320}{68} = 4.7 \text{ days per incident} \]

Why Incident Investigation Analysis Matters?
✅ Ensures incidents are properly analyzed and prevented.
✅ Improves response time to workplace safety hazards.
✅ Enhances compliance with safety regulations.
✅ Strengthens safety culture by promoting accountability.

By consistently analyzing incident investigations, organizations can develop proactive safety strategies to mitigate risks and protect employees.

11. Safety Meetings and Communication:

Effective safety meetings and communication are essential for maintaining a safe work environment and ensuring employees are well-informed about workplace hazards, policies, and best practices. Measuring the effectiveness of safety meetings and communication helps organizations evaluate their impact and identify areas for improvement.

Sample Data for Safety Meetings & Communication (Jan–Dec)
Month	Scheduled Safety Meetings	Actual Meetings Conducted	Attendance (%)	Action Items Assigned	Action Items Completed	Completion Rate (%)
Jan	4	4	85%	10	9	90%
Feb	4	3	80%	8	7	87.50%
Mar	4	4	88%	12	11	91.60%
Apr	4	3	75%	9	7	77.70%
May	4	4	92%	10	9	90%
Jun	4	3	78%	11	9	81.80%
Jul	4	4	89%	13	12	92.30%
Aug	4	3	82%	10	8	80%
Sep	4	4	87%	12	10	83.30%
Oct	4	3	79%	9	7	77.70%
Nov	4	4	90%	11	10	90.90%
Dec	4	4	91%	10	9	90%
Total	48	43	84.3% (Avg)	125	108	86.4% (Avg)

Key Metrics for Measuring Safety Meetings and Communication

1️⃣ Number of Safety Meetings Held

Formula

\[ \text{Meeting Completion Rate} =\left( \frac{\text{Actual Safety Meetings Conducted}}{\text{Planned Safety Meetings}} \right) \times 100 \]

Calculations

\[ \text{Meeting Completion Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{43}}{\text{48}} \right) \times 100 = 89.6\% \]

2️⃣ Attendance Rate at Safety Meetings

Formula

\[ \text{Attendance Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Employees Attended}}{\text{Total Employees Nominated}} \right) \times 100 \]

Calculations

Example: If a company has 100 employees and 85 attended the meeting, the attendance rate would be:

\[ \text{Meeting Attendance Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{85}}{\text{100}} \right) \times 100 = 85\% \]

3️⃣ Action Items Completion Rate

Formula

\[ \text{Completion Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Action Items Completed}}{\text{Total Action Items Assigned}} \right) \times 100 \]

Calculations

\[ \text{Completion Rate} = \left( \frac{108}{125} \right) \times 100 = 86.4\% \]

Why It Matters
✔️ Ensures employees receive critical safety information.
✔️ Promotes active participation in workplace safety.
✔️ Identifies communication gaps to improve safety awareness.
✔️ Strengthens overall workplace safety culture.

12. Management Commitment:

Management commitment is one of the most critical factors in ensuring a strong safety culture. When leadership prioritizes workplace safety, employees are more likely to follow safety protocols and engage in proactive safety behaviors. Measuring management commitment helps organizations evaluate how actively leaders support and enforce safety initiatives.

Table: Management Commitment to Safety (Jan – Dec)

Month	Safety Budget ($)	Total Budget ($)	Management Meetings Attended	Total Scheduled Meetings	Safety Concerns Reported	Response Time (Days)	Employees Recognized	Total Employees
Jan	45,000	900,000	8	10	6	12	5	120
Feb	48,000	950,000	7	9	5	10	4	118
Mar	50,000	1,000,000	9	11	7	8	6	122
Apr	55,000	1,100,000	8	10	4	7	7	125
May	60,000	1,200,000	10	12	3	6	8	130
Jun	62,000	1,250,000	9	11	5	9	7	128
Jul	58,000	1,150,000	7	9	8	11	6	127
Aug	61,000	1,220,000	8	10	6	10	5	124
Sep	59,000	1,180,000	9	11	4	7	7	123
Oct	63,000	1,260,000	10	12	3	5	8	129
Nov	66,000	1,320,000	11	13	2	4	9	132
Dec	70,000	1,400,000	12	14	1	3	10	135
Total	697,000	13,930,000	98	132	54	92	82	1,513

Key Metrics for Measuring Management Commitment

1️⃣ Safety Budget Allocation

Formula:

\[ \text{Safety Budget Percentage} = \left( \frac{\text{Total Safety Budget}}{\text{Total Organizational Budget}} \right) \times 100 \]

Example: If a company’s total budget is $13.93 million and $697,000 is allocated for safety, then:

\[ \text{Safety Budget Percentage} = \left( \frac{\text{697,000}}{\text{13,930,000}} \right) \times 100 = 5\% \]

✅ The company allocates 5% of its total budget to safety, which is a reasonable investment in safety measures.

2️⃣ Participation in Safety Meetings & Audits

Formula:

\( \text{Management Participation Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Meetings or Audits Attended by Management}}{\text{Total Scheduled Meetings or Audits}} \right) \times 100 \)

Example: If 132 safety meetings are scheduled, and management attends 98, then:

\[ \left( \frac{98}{132} \right) \times 100 = 74.24\% \]

✅ A 74.24% participation rate shows good management involvement in safety discussions, but there is room for improvement.

3️⃣ Response Time to Safety Concerns & Corrective Actions

\( \text{Average Response Time} = \left( \frac{\text{Total Time Taken to Address Safety Concerns}}{\text{Number of Concerns Reported}} \right) \)

Example: If management takes an average of 10 days to respond to 50 safety concerns, the response time is:

\[ \left( \frac{92}{54} \right) = 1.7 \text{ days} \]

✅ Management takes an average of 1.7 days to respond to safety concerns, showing efficiency in addressing issues.

✅ Faster response times indicate a proactive approach to resolving safety issues.

4️⃣ Recognition & Rewards for Safety Performance

Formula

\( \text{Recognition Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Employees Recognized for Safety Initiatives}}{\text{Total Employees}} \right) \times 100 \)

\[ \left( \frac{82}{1,513} \right) \times 100 = 5.4\% \]

✅ 5.4% of employees were recognized for safety contributions. Increasing this number could encourage more safety-conscious behavior.

✅Encouraging safety through recognition programs fosters a culture of accountability and motivation.

Why It Matters
✔️ Demonstrates leadership’s commitment to employee well-being.
✔️ Strong commitment to safety is reflected in budget allocation and management participation.
✔️ Fast response times to safety concerns indicate an effective reporting system.
✔️ Recognition rates can be improved to boost motivation for safety practices..
✔️ Builds employee trust in management’s safety efforts

14. Safety Equipment & Resource Utilization:

Measuring the utilization of safety equipment and resources ensures that essential tools are available, functional, and used effectively in workplace safety programs. Poor utilization can lead to unsafe working conditions, while optimal utilization ensures preparedness for emergencies and compliance with safety regulations.

Sample Data: Safety Equipment & Resource Utilization (Jan – Dec)

Month	Total Safety Equipment Available	Equipment Required	Equipment Used	Equipment Maintenance Conducted	Scheduled Maintenance	Stock Replenished	Stock Required
Jan	95	100	90	12	15	80	85
Feb	92	100	88	14	16	78	82
Mar	97	100	91	13	15	84	88
Apr	93	100	87	15	16	79	83
May	96	100	92	14	14	85	87
Jun	94	100	90	12	14	81	84
Jul	91	100	86	13	15	76	80
Aug	98	100	93	14	14	88	89
Sep	97	100	92	15	15	87	88
Oct	95	100	91	13	13	82	86
Nov	96	100	94	14	14	85	89
Dec	99	100	95	16	16	90	92
Total	1,143	1,200	1,081	165	177	995	1,043

1️⃣ Equipment Availability Rate (%)

Measures whether safety equipment is available when needed.

Formula

\[ \text{Equipment Availability Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Total Equipment Available}}{\text{Total Equipment Required}} \right) \times 100 \]

\[ = \left( \frac{1,143}{1,200} \right) \times 100 = 95.25\% \]

✅ The equipment availability rate is 95.25%, indicating that most required safety equipment is available.

2️⃣ Equipment Usage Compliance (%)

Ensures that employees use personal protective equipment (PPE) and safety tools.

Formula

\[ \text{Equipment Usage Compliance} = \left( \frac{\text{Equipment Used}}{\text{Equipment Required}} \right) \times 100 \]

\[ = \left( \frac{1,081}{1,200} \right) \times 100 = 90.08\% \]

✅ A 90.08% compliance rate demonstrates strong adherence to safety equipment usage; however, even a small gap can lead to serious risks.

✅ In high-risk environments, 100% compliance is not just ideal—it is essential. Every instance of non-compliance increases the likelihood of injury, incidents, or long-term health consequences.

3️⃣ Equipment Maintenance Compliance (%)

Tracks whether regular maintenance is performed as scheduled.

Formula

\[ \text{Maintenance Compliance Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Maintenance Conducted}}{\text{Scheduled Maintenance}} \right) \times 100 \]

\[ = \left( \frac{165}{177} \right) \times 100 = 93.22\% \]

✅ A 93.22% maintenance compliance rate suggests that most scheduled maintenance activities were completed.

4️⃣ Stock Replenishment Rate (%)

Measures how effectively safety supplies are restocked.

Formula

\[ \text{Stock Replenishment Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Stock Replenished}}{\text{Stock Required}} \right) \times 100 \]

\[ = \left( \frac{995}{1043} \right) \times 100 = 95.41\% \]

✅ A 95.41% replenishment rate indicates that the company effectively maintains safety stock levels.

Why it matters?

✅ High equipment availability (95.25%) ensures employees have access to essential safety gear.
✅ Usage compliance (90.08%) shows good but improvable adherence to PPE and safety protocols.
✅ Regular maintenance (93.22%) prevents failures and ensures operational efficiency.
✅ Stock replenishment (95.41%) guarantees safety supplies remain available when needed.

15. Indirect Operational Discipline Metrics

1️⃣ Employee Turnover Rate (%)

Employee turnover is a critical metric in workplace safety performance, as high turnover rates can indicate issues related to job safety, workplace culture, and employee satisfaction. Frequent employee departures may lead to skill gaps, increased training costs, and safety risks due to inexperienced workers.

Formula for Employee Turnover Rate:

\[ \text{Turnover Rate (%)} = \left( \frac{\text{Number of Employees Who Left}}{\text{Average Number of Employees}} \right) \times 100 \]

Where:

✔ Number of Employees Who Left refers to voluntary and involuntary exits within a given period.
✔ Average Number of Employees is calculated as:

Average Number of Employees is calculated as:​

\[ \text{Average Employees} = \frac{\text{Employees at the Beginning} + \text{Employees at the End}}{2} \]

Sample Data Table for Employee Turnover Rate (Monthly)

#	Month	Employees at Start	Employees at End	Employees Left	Average Employees	Turnover Rate (%)
1	Jan	250	248	5	249	2
2	Feb	248	245	6	246.5	2.4
3	Mar	245	243	4	244	1.6
4	Apr	243	240	5	241.5	2.1
5	May	240	238	4	239	1.7
6	Jun	238	235	6	236.5	2.5
7	Jul	235	232	5	233.5	2.1
8	Aug	232	230	4	231	1.7
9	Sep	230	228	4	229	1.7
10	Oct	228	225	5	226.5	2.2
11	Nov	225	223	4	224	1.8
12	Dec	223	220	5	221.5	2.3
Total / Average				57	237.5	2.0% (Avg.)

Calculation Example for January:

\[ \text{Turnover Rate} = \left( \frac{5}{249} \right) \times 100 = 2.0\% \]

✅ The average turnover rate for the year is 2.0%, which suggests a relatively stable workforce.
✅ Higher turnover months (e.g., June, October, December) may indicate seasonal job changes or safety-related concerns.

Why It Matters?

✅ If turnover increases significantly, it may be necessary to investigate safety conditions, training adequacy, and employee satisfaction to identify and mitigate underlying issues.
✅ A lower turnover rate generally indicates a safer, more satisfied workforce, reducing the need for frequent training and enhancing operational efficiency.

2️⃣ Employee Turnover Rate (%)

Employee absenteeism is a key metric in workplace safety performance, reflecting employee well-being, job satisfaction, and potential workplace hazards. High absenteeism rates may indicate safety concerns, poor working conditions, or disengagement among employees.

Sample Data Table for Employee Absenteeism Rate (Monthly)

Sr #	Month	Total Employees	Workdays in Month	Total Workdays Available	Total Absent Days	Absenteeism Rate (%)
1	Jan	250	22	5,500	85	1.55%
2	Feb	248	20	4,960	78	1.57%
3	Mar	245	23	5,635	102	1.81%
4	Apr	243	21	5,103	95	1.86%
5	May	240	22	5,280	88	1.67%
6	Jun	238	21	4,998	90	1.80%
7	Jul	235	23	5,405	110	2.03%
8	Aug	232	22	5,104	98	1.92%
9	Sep	230	21	4,830	85	1.76%
10	Oct	228	23	5,244	105	2.00%
11	Nov	225	22	4,950	95	1.92%
12	Dec	223	21	4,683	92	1.97%
Total / Average				62,692	1,123	1.79% (Avg.)

Formula for Employee Absenteeism Rate:

\[ \text{Absenteeism Rate (%)} = \left( \frac{\text{Total Absent Days}}{\text{Total Workdays Available}} \right) \times 100 \]

Where

✅ Total Absent Days refers to the total number of days employees were absent due to illness, injury, or other reasons.
✅ Total Workdays Available is calculated as:

\[ \text{Total Workdays Available}= \text{Total Employees} \times \text{Workdays in a Month} \]

For the month of Jan

\[ \text{Total Workdays Available}= \text{250} \times \text{22} = 5,500\]

\[ \text{Absenteeism Rate} = \left( \frac{85}{5,500} \right) \times 100 = 1.55\% \]

✅ A consistent increase in absenteeism may require investigation into workplace safety conditions, job satisfaction, and employee health programs.
✅ A lower absenteeism rate suggests a healthier, more engaged workforce, leading to higher productivity, fewer disruptions, and better safety performance.

• The average absenteeism rate for the year is 1.79%, which is within an acceptable range for most industries.
• Higher absenteeism months (e.g., July, October, March) may indicate seasonal illnesses, burnout, or workplace safety concerns.

Why It Matters?

✅ Workplace Safety & Hazards – Frequent absences may indicate workplace injuries, hazardous conditions, or ineffective safety protocols. A safe work environment directly reduces absenteeism.
✅ Employee Well-being & Engagement – A disengaged or overworked workforce is more likely to take unplanned absences. Ensuring proper workload balance and job satisfaction helps maintain productivity.
✅ Operational Efficiency & Costs – Unscheduled absences disrupt workflow, increase overtime costs, and lower overall productivity. Businesses with lower absenteeism rates operate more efficiently and profitably.
✅ Regulatory & Compliance Risks – A high absenteeism rate, particularly due to work-related illnesses or injuries, can signal non-compliance with occupational health and safety standards, increasing the risk of legal action or penalties.

Conclusion: How to Measure Safety Performance – Key Metrics for Workplace Safety

Measuring safety performance is not merely a compliance exercise; it’s a continuous journey toward creating a healthier, more productive, and ultimately safer work environment. It helps pinpoint areas for improvement, ensures compliance with regulations, and actively engages employees in cultivating a safety culture.

By diligently tracking and analyzing the key metrics outlined – from lagging indicators like Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) and Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) to leading indicators like hazard reporting, training participation, safety audits and safety observations – organizations gain valuable insights into the effectiveness of their safety programs.

The data-driven approach allows for proactively identifying potential hazards, targeted interventions, and a culture of continuous improvement. Remember that safety is a shared responsibility, and actively engaging employees in the measurement process encourages ownership and strengthens the commitment to a safe workplace for everyone.

Ultimately, the goal is to record numbers and use those numbers to drive meaningful change, prevent future incidents, and protect the well-being of your most valuable asset: your people.

References:

https://www.osha.gov/safety-management/program-evaluation

https://www.hse.gov.uk/involvement/monitorperformance.htm